Wahlfach Herbstsemester 2019

Territorium der Stadt: Neapel

Wahlfach HS19: Territorium der Stadt: Neapel. Satellitenaufnahme vom Vesuv. Rot gefärbt sind die unbesiedelten Gebiete. © NASA/GSFC/METI/ERSDAC/JAROS, and U.S./Japan ASTER Science Team

Landschaft als Ressource

Die Wahlfachreihe «Territorium der Stadt: Landschaft als Ressource» befasst sich mit aktuellen Transformationsprozessen metropolitaner Landschaften in Europa und führt in das landschaftsarchitektonische Entwerfen im territorialen Massstab ein.

Im Herbstsemester 2019 findet das Wahlfach in Neapel, der drittgrößten Stadt Italien, statt. Auf Basis eines Fieldtrips und kartografischer Analysen mittels GIS entwickeln die Studierenden konkrete Strategien für die metropolitane Landschaft Neapels, die sich mit rund 4 Millionen Einwohnerinnen und Einwohnern entlang der Mittelmeerküste und zwischen zwei Vulkangebiete – dem Vesuv und den Phlegräische Felder – erstreckt.

Organisatorisches

Assistenz: Amalia Bonsack
Wahlfach (052-0717-19 G – 2 KP) und mögliche Wahlfacharbeit (063-0629-19 A – 6KP) oder Vertiefungsarbeit NSL (063-0751-19 A – 6KP).
Die Reise nach Neapel findet am Wochenende vom 04.10.19 – 07.10.19 statt.
Der Unkostenbeitrag beträgt CHF 200.
Hinweis: Der Kurs ist bereits ausgebucht!

Archive

City Territory

The type and the extent of the use of the landscape have changed fundamentally in the last few decades. One reason is that the landscape as a resource is much more intensively used, as illustrated by the strong increase in the destruction of raw materials and material transport as well as the massive build up of infrastructures. At the same time, the level of use in particular areas is also being extensified, which causes fallow land and eventually a return to wilderness. In addition, landscapes are increasingly subordinated to fast-paced and, in part, globally effective changes in mobility, climate, energy and free-time activities. The result is a radical transformation of landscapes, whereby the change takes place inconsistently and unequally.

The historical coexistence and spatial separation of the uses of the landscape up to this point, e.g. agriculture, transport or tourism, are increasingly disappearing. In their place, an operationalized landscape appears in which the informal recreational and sport uses of a metropolitan context are also increasingly enlisted. New forms of ‘parks’ emerge that are no longer clearly comprehensible and classifiable, instead, they spread out temporarily and are spatially diffused over the urban territory.

The driving force behind these developments can be placed on the build-up of the infrastructure network of public transportation as well as on the often chronic overuse on inner city free spaces. The number of recreation seekers expands as a result of the action-radius, i.e. the nearby and quickly reachable available recreational landscapes. This process often takes place informally and results in the overburdening and interweaving of partially contrasting interests.

However, the resulting friction and conflicts carry a lot of potential: Landscapes will no longer function only as economic resources, but will be increasingly recognized as a public resource. A future debate about the kind and modality of their use and the possibility of an integral, democratic development of the landscape as a public good will make this possible.